Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladesh–Slovakia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 17:06, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Bangladesh–Slovakia relations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The relationship and article is based on a loose collection of facts. Only one leader visit in 20 years of relations. The article says Bangladeshi exports of 100 million is euro is significant, which it isn't really as Slovakia imports USD74 billion a years. And these exports are clothing which is what Bangladesh exports everywhere. The 2 countries only drafted an agreement but I see no evidence of it being ratified. Lastly neither country has a resident ambassador. LibStar (talk) 16:53, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 17:30, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovakia-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 17:31, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 17:31, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. –  nafSadh did say 02:22, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep article should be kept according to the general notability guidelines. Slovakia was visited by Prime Minister of Bangladesh, so the relationship is significant. Nomian (talk) 16:43, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - wait, what? The general notability guidelines require significant coverage in multiple reliable sources - that's significant coverage of the formal diplomatic relationship between these countries. A stop-over in one country by the leader of another isn't an indication of anything beyond it being a nice or convenient place for a stop-over. It says nothing about the formal diplomatic relationship between the two countries. In fact, there isn't anything that says anything about the formal diplomatic relationship between the two countries so this fails WP:GNG comprehensively.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 13:00, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.