Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladesh Booty (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:02, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Bangladesh Booty
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unremarkable pornographic video. No awards, spurious claim of notability because of the title (filmed in the US with mostly non-Bangladeshi performers). Delicious carbuncle (talk) 13:34, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 18:21, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 14 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment at the 2nd AFD three years ago, I opined a keep with the expectation that the article could/would be improved. There is one short genre source reviewing the film, and aparently it was covered in something called Maximum X posure  I do not expect that it will ever be covered by The New York Times, and the only reasonable argument toward notability is in the film being "the first internationally-released formal/official porn movie to bear the name of Bangladesh and to feature a Bangladeshi in the female lead."  Is that enough?  Schmeidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:38, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete The only basis to notability that I see is that a newspaper described the lead actress as the "The first Bangladeshi pornstar." This is at most a claim to notability for Jazmin, the actress, and not the movie she appeared in. It is all just nonsense anyway. This same actress pulled the same scam in 2002 with Pakistani Poon, where she is billed as the first Pakistani whatever. Oh, and she is also Indian in Kick Ass Chicks #43: Indian Girls (2007). Kauffner (talk) 12:42, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete There is nothing remarkable about this film.  Many firsts are made in porn, but they do not get articles.  The only claim to notability is the ethnicity of the lead role, which is not notable.Curb Chain (talk) 18:15, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.