Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladesh Internet Professionals' Community (BIPC)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is a WP:Soft delete; the article may be restored by any administrator upon request. MelanieN (talk) 00:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Bangladesh Internet Professionals' Community (BIPC)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not pass the guideline Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 16:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 16:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 16:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 16:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 16:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 16:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 16:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:05, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The only source cited is the organization itself. Searches of the usual Google types, HighBeam, and EBSCO found:
 * Two recaps of a 2014 BIPC press conference about an upcoming event, - these contain no independent journalistic analysis, they're no better than a press release
 * One article about the one-day 2014 conference
 * One sentence in an article about a 2015 tech expo
 * WP:ORGSIG asks us "When evaluating the notability of organizations or products, please consider whether they have had any significant or demonstrable effects on [anything]". It may be unrealistic of the author to expect an 18-month old organization to have achieved enough, and consequently attracted enough notice by the world at large, to justify a Wikipedia article. Does not meet WP:ORG. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:45, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 07:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 17:42, 13 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.