Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladesh and Hong Kong in One day Internationals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:26, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Bangladesh and Hong Kong in One day Internationals

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am also nominating the following related pages because they fail the same criteria:

Delete all. Information is more readily available in specialist online cricket sites and should not be repeated here per WP:NOTSTATS, WP:DIRECTORY. Jack | talk page 12:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC) Jack | talk page 12:18, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and several similar lists at AfD that all are along the same lines.  Lugnuts  Precious bodily fluids 15:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all - on balance need to be deleted for the reasons given above. If the prose sections of the two team ones were expanded significantly then I could foresee a situation where I might not feel that way, although I imagine that the content might be better stuck on the relevant tour or year pages anyway. At the moment it's far too statistically driven in a completionist fashion - exactly what we shouldn't be about per the policies cited. Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:30, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all. WP:NOTSTATS, WP:NOTMIRROR. Wikipedia is not espnCricinfo. Ajf773 (talk) 20:13, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all Per above, and my comments on similar discussions. Joseph2302 08:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:20, 12 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as WP:NOTSTATS and WP:LISTCRUFT. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.