Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangladesh and Kenya in Twenty20 Internationals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 17:42, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Bangladesh and Kenya in Twenty20 Internationals

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am also nominating the following related pages because they fail the same criteria:

Delete all. Information is more readily available in specialist online cricket sites and should not be repeated here per WP:NOTSTATS, WP:DIRECTORY. Jack | talk page 12:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC) Jack | talk page 12:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and several similar lists at AfD that all are along the same lines.  Lugnuts  Precious bodily fluids 15:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all for the reasons given here and elsewhere. Again, if the team v team articles were prose driven without the emphasis on statistical lists only then I could see a situation where articles might be worthwhile. Not now though. Blue Square Thing (talk) 15:32, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment The argument that it is available on CI or CA doesn't hold good. Also if prose is missing so we should categorize it as stub as Wikipedia is collaborative effort and it improves with time. Incomplete article doesn't mean to delete.  GreenCricket  (talk)  13:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all. WP:NOTSTATS, WP:NOTMIRROR. Wikipedia is not espnCricinfo. Ajf773 (talk) 20:17, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all Per above, and my comments on similar discussions. Joseph2302 08:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete all per above and previous discussions, thanks Jack for your diligence in finding all these.  IgnorantArmies  (talk)  10:35, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.