Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangli Rangers F.C.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Liga Indonesia Second Division. Only one weak keep argument, the rest favour deletion or redirect. No arguments against the suggestion to redirect, so that's what we'll go with. Michig (talk) 08:56, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Bangli Rangers F.C.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG.No source. Yogwi21 talk 13:24, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable club. Fails GNG.  ƬheStrike  Σagle   13:50, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:34, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Weak keep - Although the club plays in the fourth tier, the source provided apparently indicates this is still a national level league, so the club pass WP:FOOTYN. We have thousands of other articles for clubs at comparable levels or lower so I'm happy for this to stay unless someone can prove that the now dead link is wrong. Fenix down (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Liga Indonesia Second Division; not independently notable but possible search term. GiantSnowman 21:11, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the same article for the same reason as GS provided. — Jkudlick t c s 05:55, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:43, 22 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:30, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.