Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banhammer (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Block (Internet). ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  15:08, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Banhammer
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NEOLOGISM. The article has already been through two AfDs (deleted the first time and redirected to Ban (law) the second) and a deletion review (which upheld the decision). I would also be open to the idea of merging and redirecting it to Ban (law) (once again) or Block (Internet), though if we were to go that route, I would lean towards the latter article. Graham (talk) 06:47, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Block (Internet) or delete. It's imperfect, but Block (Internet) is pretty much the same thing.  This seems more applicable to Wiktionary or Urban Dictionary.  It surely gets used in reliable sources, but so do lots of other phrases.  Merely being used doesn't make a neologism notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect back to Block (Internet). Seeing how the sourcing remains the same as before, the article has not been significantly expanded to show notability or warrant a split. It seems a section at most in the Block article would be sufficient for the size of content in question. I am unclear why the article was restored after the AfD otherwise. — HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 13:21, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    21:30, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:20, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.