Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banking Ombudsman Scheme (New Zealand)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Banking Ombudsman Scheme (New Zealand)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It exists, but it is unclear what would make it notable. Boleyn (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 01:42, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --BonkHindrance (talk) 03:46, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.