Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bankroll Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Bankroll Records

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:CORP. No significant pages found. no WP:RS. Triwbe (talk) 19:11, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —Triwbe (talk) 19:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —Triwbe (talk) 19:15, 23 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep - Disagree. Label mentioned by reputable news sources. Notable for being one of the rare Dubstep record labels.  Has notable artists and affiliates. Professorchinese (talk) 19:29, 23 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - lacks coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:26, 24 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - I don't see any ghits beyond local directory listings and the two references listed don't have the word 'bankroll' in them. Clubmarx (talk) 00:32, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this company. Joe Chill (talk) 21:51, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.