Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banner (administrative division)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn -- JForget  23:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Banner (administrative division)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unencyclopædic article that doesn't even define the term or verify that it is actually an administrative division. Tavix (talk) 02:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 *  Weak keep - Article has almost no context, but the subject seems notable. Perhaps boldly redirect to Banner (Inner Mongolia)? -FrankTobia (talk) 03:18, 22 June 2008 (UTC) Looks good now thanks to Dravecky. -FrankTobia (talk) 05:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - What is the proposer doing? It is clearly a disambiguation page bringing readers to the various WP articles about the administrative division called "banner" in various cultures. Badagnani (talk) 03:20, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 *  Weak keep subject is notable; article is merely a dicdef though. Maybe best as a dab page or a rd? JJL (talk) 03:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep as this is a disambiguation page in need of reformatting, not deletion. - Dravecky (talk) 14:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Update I have reworked and expanded the page a bit to make clearer both the historic and global usage of this term although it could, certainly, use further expansion. - Dravecky (talk) 01:41, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Good work, Dravecky. Very nice. -FrankTobia (talk) 05:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep, as it reads now its fairly clear that it's a disambiguation page, and is a necessary disambig page at that. Boccobrock • T  04:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Withdraw, Nice work: the disambiguation makes it look a whole lot nicer than it did. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tavix (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.