Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banny


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy Deleted as A6 attack page and recreation of previously deleted page. Capitalistroadster 10:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Banny
PROD removed with no explanation. Neologism, see Avoid neologisms, also the reasoning of Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day comes to mind... like I said in the PROD, gives no evidence of verifiable use or definition of this term. W.marsh 00:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Neologism, WP:NFT, probably a not-too-subtle attack on someone with that name or nickname. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  00:34, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. I could support a Speedy Delete per CSD A6 too. Gw e rnol 00:53, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not verified. Tyrenius 01:59, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. neologism and non notable at that. I would support a speedy too.--John Lakonias 06:48, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as borderline patent nonsense. Kimchi.sg 07:11, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see the point. Psychomelodic (people think edit) 08:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable neologism, made up in school one day. J I P  | Talk 08:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.