Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banoffee Pie

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP. Howabout1 Talk to me! 03:42, August 7, 2005 (UTC) Please note, I am not an administrator. I close only keep debates.

Banoffee Pie
Delete. Whilst a very tasty dessert, this well-meant article is a semi-recipe that is unlikely to expand beyond that. -Splash 20:21, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * keep. There are numerous other pages similar that is why I made it. I will add more information in to make it more "useful" to you. Also would it help if a recipe was added instead of links to recipes'? Cokehabit 20:25, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * keep. It is a very well known and popular desert and I'm sure much more can and will be added to the article. Evil Eye 20:29, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * keep. And it's great when you have teh munchies. But seriously, I think it should be kept, it does have value. beu 23:18, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * There is no such user. Vote actually by anon IP 80.235.134.39. -Splash 22:36, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * keep. I see absolutely no reason it can't expand and more can't be added - the article has no problems at all being well-written. Plasmaroo 22:21, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * User's 38th edit.-Splash 22:36, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * keep. This well written article should be kept. tomaw 22:21, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * User's first and only edit. -Splash 22:36, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * delete. Tastes fantastic, but the potential for abuse is still very high. Certainly don't want another definition which is best left in the likes of Urban Dictionary ;-) Perhaps best sent to the trash can for deletion methinks. AlexHowells 22:25, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * User's first edit. All 3 made so far to this VfD. -Splash 22:36, 31 July 2005 (UTC).
 * Keep and move to Banoffee pie. While I'm loath to agree with the sock puppets, I don't see the rationale behind the nomination. Ideally a recipe should be written at wikibooks and linked to from this article. Flowerparty talk 23:00, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * My rationale is that to be an encyclopedia article, it should be about the history and cultural significance of banoffee pie, not just a half-hearted recipe for it. WP is not a cookbook, and I find that restaurant's claim to have invented thing a little hard to take and in any case unverifiable. I cannot fathom why this needs sockpuppets, either.-Splash 23:05, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Well that seems fair; if the pub did invent the thing then it's news to me. But it's still a well-known dessert and the claim can be rephrased or simply edited out if it's proven to be false. I can't agree that it's unlikely to be expanded; it's not even got a picture yet. Flowerparty talk 23:35, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and move as per above (and darn those socks) --Doc (?) 23:41, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep/Move as above; appears to be a real pie, even if claim of inventorship is not verifiable. (Now I'm all hungry!) --Alan Au 00:08, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep/move as per above and mark as needing expansion. Yum. -- The Anome 07:57, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page..