Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banstead Woods Parkrun 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:00, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Banstead Woods Parkrun

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This individual parkrun event is not notable. The sources listed as not RS. I redirected this article to parkrun but was reverted. Natureium (talk) 19:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC) Natureium (talk) 19:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable for being only the third parkrun out of 500 events. Almost 10,000 participants, with a BBC reference. Middledistance99 (talk) 19:38, 21 August 2018 (UTC) Strike vote from sockpuppet. --Yamla (talk) 22:25, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * That's a textbook example of a trivial mention. Natureium (talk) 19:46, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes but it is still at least mentioned. I will try to find better sources for the page. I really think these pages have a place on Wikipedia. I do not see how an event which has accomodated many thousands of people is not notable. Middledistance99 (talk) 19:51, 21 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete as unencyclopedic. Almost all individual parkruns have no encyclopedic relevance. Anything remarkable about individual parkruns can be covered in the Parkrun article, but there's nothing here. --Michig (talk) 06:51, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Michig above.--Tacyarg (talk) 15:56, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. There isn't any substantial coverage in independent reliable sources, and there doesn't even seem to be any insubstantial coverage in such sources, with the exception of the very brief mention in the BBC source cited in the article. The Banstead Woods event isn't mentioned in the Parkrun article, so redirecting this there would not be helpful to the reader. You might be interested in the essay  What notability is not, which explains that "'notable' does not simply mean 'noteworthy,' which is a standard way that the term is defined by a dictionary. On Wikipedia, notability is a test used by editors to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article." You might also find Notability: Why we have these requirements useful, if you haven't read it. – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 23:39, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 August 23.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 07:55, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as per WP:RBI. This was created by a block-evading sockpuppet account. --Yamla (talk) 22:25, 24 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.