Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baobab-K


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 06:24, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Baobab-K

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable military vehicle. Beyond photos of it, I can't find sourcing that discusses it in RS. Oaktree b (talk) 02:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Technology. Oaktree b (talk) 02:11, 16 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @Oaktree b This is the official site of the military company (https://www.hsw.pl/en/offer/scattered-mine-laying-system-baobab-k/). Onesgje9g334 (talk) 08:44, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @Oaktree b And here is another one from Busniss Insider (https://businessinsider.com.pl/wiadomosci/baobab-k-zasili-polska-armie-co-to-za-pojazd-wideo/fzj21j8). Onesgje9g334 (talk) 17:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep notable per this by-lined article and these two others. Looks like there are probably still more sources out there, too.
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 05:14, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist (Attention to those admins who just review AFDs with 3 relists! Here's one). Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - added some refs, there is probably enough for inclusion. - Indefensible (talk) 02:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 15:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - The sources discussed above and added to the article seem to show enough notability to meet WP:GNG. It also meets Notability (vehicles), but I wouldn't put too much weight on meeting that seemingly-forgotten niche essay. - Aoidh (talk) 17:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep and close now per Relist. Okoslavia (talk) 22:35, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per all above; article seems (now) to be amply sourced to meet the WP:GNG. -- Visviva (talk) 23:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.