Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baptist Hospital of Miami


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 01:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Baptist Hospital of Miami

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete another one-line unreferenced article for a hospital basically telling us no more than it exists. No indication of notability, etc. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:44, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete--I don't believe hospitals are inherently notable, and I find no significant coverage of this hospital whatsoever. 207.157.121.50 (talk) 17:51, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added some references. -- Eastmain (talk) 19:33, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep plenty of reliable references are available to prove that the hospital is notable and to support a verifiable article, as has been demonstrated by Eastmain. Stubs shouldn't be deleted just because they are stubs if there is potential for them to become articles. We don't have a deadline. Drawn Some (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I get 750+ results on a Newsbank search. See the work I did on the similar Larkin Community Hospital article, I'm confident the same work could be done with this article. --Chiliad22 (talk) 21:57, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Major hospitals are notable. There is one substantial article about it, serving as proof, a source from whioch the article could be improved.  I wouldn't go by a count of  other news stories as they are likely to be passing or trivial mentions, such as the other 3 references in the article. . DGG (talk) 02:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability not asserted. JFW | T@lk  10:16, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.