Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baputty Haji


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 22:53, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Baputty Haji

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

We definately need better sourcing than this to write an article. A trawl through google, Google books and Google News found nothing usable and this has had a month to improve. I think this fails GNG and N so here we are. Spartaz Humbug! 11:24, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails notability. The source on the article is about the organization the person is founder of rather than the person himself. Torreslfchero (talk) 21:59, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, even if all facts listed in the article can be referenced to reliable sources, I do not see why this person is notable.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:46, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete unfortunately. Given what was in the article before I scrubbed it, I actually do think the person may be notable, but it's entirely likely that the sources we need are not in English. I think we have to delete this and wait to see if either English sources or someone who can find non-English sources appears. Qwyrxian (talk) 09:46, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.