Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baradwaj Rangan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:03, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Baradwaj Rangan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A film critic of The Hindu newspaper but not qualified for standalone article. Yes he does write movie reviews; so does 500 other critics in India. The  Aven gers  04:21, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Strong keep - He's not just a critic, he's also a national award winner., which alone should be enough for notability. Coderzombie (talk) 04:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Strong keep - He is a recipient of the National Film Award for Best Film Critic, which alone makes him notable. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 06:03, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * We need some third party reliable sources other than BITSAA and The Hindu, where he is employed. Indian Govt. website will mention his name if he got National award. -- The   Aven gers  02:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Here you go. The official announcement. Coderzombie (talk) 05:53, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The same sources lie before you as well. A badly-written article always doesn't equate to an AFD. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 09:43, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment: While my comment is neither about keeping nor deleting his article, it can be expanding using the existing sources, which establish his notability. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * This discussion is all about the notability the subject, not the article. &mdash; Vensatry (Talk) 11:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  12:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  12:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep per Coderzombie and Vensatry. The award is sourced in the article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep The award is quite sufficient; then there is his position as deputy editor of what I believe is a national newspaper in India. Vanamonde93 (talk) 08:37, 2 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Yes, the article is not well written but that does not mean it should be deleted. There are enough sources to keep this article on Wikipedia. There are lots of wikipedian who can make this article better. Suman420 (talk) 14:02, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.