Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baragowah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Notability established. (non-admin closure) ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 07:30, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Baragowah

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Would the article's creator be able to give us more information to go on? If so, perhaps there would be something to work with. Senator2029  (talk) 06:34, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * provides insufficient context to understand subject of the article
 * Unable to determine notability of this article's subject
 * Unreferenced new article


 * Keep - tidied up a bit. Place exists. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:31, 15 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Wikipedia also functions as a gazetteer. Also, the article was just created on 13 March 2012‎; why so hasty to delete? The article was created by a new user. See also: Please do not bite the newcomers. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:19, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 17 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep It's a village and populated settlements are worthy of note in an encyclopaedia. Also see WP:FIVE #1 "gazetteer" as Northamerica1000 mentioned above.--Pontificalibus (talk) 16:39, 17 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: WP:FIVE #1 "gazetteer" and speedy close per Please do not bite the newcomers. It was a good contribution (for which I see the newbie has received some recognition on his talk). -- lTopGunl (talk) 14:12, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Adding: just paid attention to the nomination summary... you should note that AFD is not clean up and get a look at WP:UGLY. -- lTopGunl (talk) 14:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.