Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbados–Belgium relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Ixfd64 (talk) 07:26, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Barbados–Belgium relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Two countries whose bilateral relationship is so unimportant and trivial to them they don't maintain embassies in each others respective capitals. No assertion of notability, none findable by me, no sources in the article or otherwise available about the topic of this relationship. Bali ultimate (talk) 15:59, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nom, this is unnecessary. - 2 ... says you, says me, suggestion box 16:09, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete If there are over 900 countries, and thousands of former countries, there could be literally millions of trivial article. The mere fact that two countries exist or once existed does not mean that we need articles such as this. Did they form alliances, or become major trading partners, or go to war, or anything else which would have caused there to be significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable sources, satisfying notability? The mere fact that they have diplomatic relations is insufficient to justify an article, since Wikipedia is not a directory. Edison (talk) 16:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as typically unremarkable, as these two countries were apparently pulled out of a hat without any research to see if an article on the topic was warranted. -- BlueSquadron Raven  21:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. the only thing these 2 countries have in common is their initial letter. LibStar (talk) 02:45, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - amusing pairing, but no evidence of any notability whatsoever. - Biruitorul Talk 16:37, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I doubt even the most herculean efforts could save this one.--Aldux (talk) 17:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.