Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbados–Turkey relations (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 22:12, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Barbados–Turkey relations
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Deleted before, see Articles for deletion/Barbadian–Turkish relations (2nd nomination).

What we have here is no embassies, some trade (only one way), ministers meeting eachother at international events, and fluff about the two countries having the same policy towards third countries (Cuba, Belize) which don't constitute a relation between countries 1+2 Geschichte (talk) 20:32, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Barbados-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:10, 28 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment: Kinda funny considering your own nomination logic on "Nicaragua-Turkey" which says the complete opposite of what you've said here and is flipped 180 degrees which said: (quote)Someone made it their task to create pages on Turkey's relations with every country in the world. Now, the task is to root out the pages without merit. Turkey's relations with *Nicaragua* seem tangential, there are no embassies. This is not to say the countries are alien; some goods are traded one way, though none the other way; some meetings have happened, but most contact seems to be funneled through broader organizational frameworks. The cultural relations are probably pretty slim.(end quote) So your agenda is just to delete Turkey articles eh? CaribDigita (talk) 01:57, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't understand a word of your argument, except for the last sentence, which is of course false, and an extremely weak counter to the nomination. I can assure you that my agenda is to keep every article which describes a viable encyclopedic topic, and delete every article which doesn't. Geschichte (talk) 11:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete level of interaction is minor. Trade is very low and basically one way. LibStar (talk) 13:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, per lack of significant coverage. Yilloslime (talk) 21:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, a Turkish-language search also failed to find anything of note. No indication of notability. --GGT (talk) 00:24, 2 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.