Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Ann Crumm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Barbara Ann Crumm

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Totally non-notable person, the creator of the page is its subject and she has repeatedly removed maintenance tags that flag her possible conflict of interest and non-notability. The article is a vanity page - consisting of speculation, personal trivia and unverifiable claims. Only sources are the subjects blogs and myspace page. BigDaddy1981 9 May 2007

Delete.

Keep Agreed that the article was first written in contravention of WP:COI. Agreed that the article as it is now requires one heck of clean-up. Don't agree, however, that the subject of the page fails WP:BIO as a few click around Google shows that she does have a fair bit of fame. Also noted that this nomination is not signed and that the nominator has made no other contributions, so faith of nomination is in question. A1octopus 21:33, 10 May 2007 (UTC) Delete - Following a more thorough search however, I cannot find enough non trivial sources to back up the article. Given that and every other reason already stated, my vote is changed. Apologies for questioning faith of nomination. A1octopus 12:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. We've got to stop cluttering up Wikipedia with these kinds of entries.  As for fame, Google often produces falsely exaggerated hits for people who've done minor work in the entertainment industry, as credits get duplicated by imdb & yahoo film sites which are repeated in different languages/countries.  Message board, LJ or Myspace hits also inadvertently pad google results.  There's no real newsworthy or content-worthy basis for this entry. 17:49, 10 May 2007
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete this vanispamcruftisement. MER-C 11:18, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per MER-C. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 20:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Read the Village Voice featured & quite serious review, cited in the article DGG 01:25, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable 02:05, 12 May 2007 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.241.15.131 (talk) 02:05, 12 May 2007 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.