Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Bietz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 17:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Barbara Bietz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Original created as a draft which was reviewed and rejected so it was then cut and pasted into main space thus avoiding review. The lack of review doesn't hide the wholesale lack of notability. The sources are all promotional and fail WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 22:54, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of notability. Alexius08 (talk) 04:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Paid is promo. Agricola44 (talk) 15:04, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:AUTHOR. Non-notable author, two awards, no coverage. Yoninah (talk) 21:11, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing here in the article to constitute notability and nothing found in a Google search to support a claim. Alansohn (talk) 03:45, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG clearly. Adityavagarwal (talk) 08:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.