Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Dunkelman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Lankiveil (speak to me) 09:17, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Barbara Dunkelman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Her solitary voice acting role in RWBY isn't enough to meet WP:ENTERTAINER (the article also mentions a role in Immersion; however, this is unsourced) and nothing else in her article appears to sufficiently indicate notability. The references consist pretty much entirely of primary sources, articles that make little or no mention of Dunkelman, and content from local or unreliable sources.  Iago Qnsi  (talk) 00:30, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * My mistake, her role in Immersion was in fact sourced with a link to the YouTube video in which she appeared. However, her role on the show has been fairly minor and I don't think this contributes to her notability. - Iago Qnsi  (talk) 00:34, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  ///Euro Car  GT  00:38, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 15 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete due to lack of primary sources. LADY LOTUS • TALK 12:14, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - actually there are primary sources; the problem appears to be lack of secondary sources. Bearian (talk) 17:47, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - this Business Journal article claims she's a co-founder of a 'con' with 30,000 attendees. I still would like better osurcing. Bearian (talk) 20:09, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep & Improve per Bearian - IMO needs better sourcing not deleting. - →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  11:12, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Delete: The article Bearian links to doesn't seem to support Dunkelman's notability. "Co-founder" seems to just mean that she works for the company that created it. In the absence of reliable independent sources discussing her work (rather than mentioning her briefly in the context of Rooster Teeth's work), she doesn't merit her own article. Moswento talky 08:42, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakr  \ talk / 11:10, 4 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Follow up: I'm going with a weak keep based on her work, but again, the sourcing needs improvement. Bearian (talk) 17:15, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.