Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Gibson (diplomat)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Barbara Gibson (diplomat)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:BIO. could not find any coverage in gnews, JSTOR or gbooks. The 2 sources provided are primary. LibStar (talk) 05:57, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - Hmm, wouldn't a PROD suffice here? The last edit in almost 2 years was this AfD nomination and the page logs don't show any red flags. — Sirdog (talk) 06:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I would prod them but there is someone out there that fiercely opposes me suggesting that ambassador articles should be deleted. LibStar (talk) 08:11, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. — Sirdog (talk) 08:35, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom. Nothing in the news, JSTOR, or books. Current sources are from the government Barbara worked for. Ambassadors do not inherently satisfy WP:NPOL. — Sirdog (talk) 08:35, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Women, Bilateral relations,  and Canada.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:10, 17 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.