Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Hawkins Elementary School (2nd)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete all. because this was a batch nomination, I will consider undeletion of individual articles if anyone can present arguments/sources on my talk page. W.marsh 03:06, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Barbara Hawkins Elementary School

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a non-notable (nor does it assert importance) elementary school. Rjd0060 14:57, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason (notability):

- Rjd0060 14:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps somebody can fix this please. The links from the main Articles for deletion/Log/2007 October 13 link to the old AfD, not the new one. However, the AfD templates on each page do go to the correct place (2nd nomination). Nevermind, I corrected it. - Rjd0060 15:32, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete All Every single one is eligible for CSD/A7.--Victor falk 15:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Also "wikipedia is not the yellow pages" and "wikipedia is a collection of ecncyclopedic knowledge, not indiscriscriminate information"--Victor falk 15:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: I would have tagged them all a7 but thought there may be problems since they have all been here for a couple years. And a few of these were in a previous AfD (here).  - Rjd0060 15:43, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete all, all give bits about enrolment, location, and principal, but other than a butterfly garden at one there's virtually nothing of note — and surely having a butterfly garden doesn't make something notable. Nyttend 15:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: I would also like to mention that I pulled all these from the Miami-Dade schools template, and there were several more elementary schools there, but I didn't list them because I felt they may have had some notability, therefore should be listed in separate AfD's. - Rjd0060 15:56, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete all for a lack of notability. Just run of the mill schools. (Not that there's anything wrong with that, but not every school needs its own article). B figura  (talk) 01:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions.   —Noroton 03:53, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all. We're paying for the "all schools are automatically notable" attitude that we had in times past. Stifle (talk) 18:07, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete all per Stifle and Bfigura. CRGreathouse (t | c) 19:53, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep all as schools have an incredible impact on the development of all of their students throughout the years and are their notable to large numbers of people and in significant ways. Best, --  Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 19:46, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't think anyone is saying that schools haven't had a huge impact on a number of their students. Rather, the question is whether the schools are notable as defined in WP:N. Best, -- B figura (talk) 20:13, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete all As mentioned before, the attitude that all schools are notable should change. They provide an important service that does not automatically translate into a standard of notability which would include them in an encyclopedia. --Stormbay 20:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.