Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Khozam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Barbara Khozam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional for non notable individual. Lacks coverage about her in independent reliable sources. Current bombardment of sources is by her, passing mentions, quotes from her, her talking about herself and press releases. Books lack reviews. No major awards. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:59, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:GNG. A self-promotion piece which lacks any independent coverage of notability. Kierzek (talk) 14:12, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ssт✈(discuss) 17:18, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ssт✈(discuss) 17:18, 11 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete low level business consultant and speaker, nothing to make her notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:25, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotional both in its text and in its sources — really, a source titled "Barbara Khozam > Compare Discount Book Prices & Save up to 90% >"?? There is no evidence of actual notability, as determined by sources that are both reliable and independent of the subject. This could be a plausible case for a G11 speedy but at this point we may as well go through with the full AfD as that should make it harder to re-create. (Also, there is some weirdness with the article history, noted on a thread on ANI — apparently this was created by moving an unrelated redirect, possibly in the misguided belief that doing so would evade new-page patrol.) —David Eppstein (talk) 07:03, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * SNOW delete and delete as TNT at best until a better article can be made. SwisterTwister   talk  03:35, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Snowing... -- per David Eppstein's reasons, though SwisterTwister's remedy is more in light with my opinion. Nothing notable there. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 05:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.