Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Wagner (prison officer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  delete. Refs are trivial mentions that don't verify notability. --PeaceNT (talk) 15:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Barbara Wagner (prison officer)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Was speedy-deleted db-bio, despite a, but looks worth an AfD discussion. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, some media attention as a result of her job, but not a significant enough position for notability by itself. Ever so slightly verges on WP:COATRACK for including the investigation. --Dhartung | Talk 20:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Absolutely no hint of notability for her. The investigation, which found nothing isn't notable either. Nothing more to see here. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 21:03, 21 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete but don't snowball since the point of this is to have a discussion. As for the delete, per all.  Thin  boy  00  @000, i.e. 22:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think the references are enough to establish notability. Barbara Wagner is regarded as an expert by the CNN television program Lou Dobbs Tonight, and has been the subject of coverage in the Albuquerque Journal and Gallup Independent. --Eastmain (talk) 01:14, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * All may do what they wish. My wish is not to cause controversy.--Steve (talk) 02:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Appearing on TV a few times as part of stories on a different topic doesn't constitute the kind of coverage needed to meet WP:N --Nick Dowling (talk) 07:06, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Information: More information has been added to page Barbara Wagner (prison officer). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * weak delete having been mentioned in a handful of stories does not meet WP:BIO. If we had more sources that we're directly about her I'd be more tempted to change my mind. JoshuaZ (talk) 20:43, 25 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.