Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara de Baalbek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:46, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Barbara de Baalbek

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Yet another book by Lina Murr Nehme described with no attempt to establish notability. &mdash; RHaworth 21:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 22:09, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 22:10, 22 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. No reviews per Google book search. No news items. Not offered for sale by Amazon or Amazon.fr. Not notable. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 09:11, 24 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - No evidence of notability in the article, and none that I could find in my own searches. -- Whpq (talk) 16:18, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - no sign of meeting WP:Notability (books). Some previous book titles have been redirected to the author's article, but the continued flood of book articles by an SPA author amounts to spamming: I think redirects should be allowed only for titles which, though they may not meet WP:BK, show some sort of indication of notability such as independent reviews, or presence in a significant number of libraries. JohnCD (talk) 16:58, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. The author is a summit in the field. For example see her article in Archeologia (455) ("LIBAN : LES TEMPLES DE BAALBEK - Qui a financé la construction de ces géants absolus de l'architecture antique ? L'examen attentif de la documentation apporte des réponses surprenantes.") — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.187.91.138 (talk) 06:44, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - But this article is about a specific book.  The notability of the author is not what is being discussed here. -- Whpq (talk) 11:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.