Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara of Karniów


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 02:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Barbara of Karniów

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet the WP:GNG/WP:ANYBIO and is an incredibly minor footnote of a figure in history, per WP:NOTGENEALOGY ColonelHenry (talk) 04:11, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:26, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: note that the Czech results ("Barbora Krnovská") look somewhat more promising, but, then, I don't read Czech. הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 19:23, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment: here (229 – 232?) is an old source in German, in which she is called Barbara of Jägerndorf. הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 01:53, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * If I understand the source correctly, she was the duchess regnant (?) of the Duchy of Jägerndorf (called by Wikipedia and its mirrors "the Duchy of Krnov") for twenty years, which may be a fair claim to notability. הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 02:03, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * ... which this lovely up-to-date source seems to confirm. הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 02:17, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Another German source:  הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) 02:32, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 10:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep She was the reigning duchess of a place. We need to better reflect this fact in the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:20, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 06:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. -- Green  C  03:14, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.