Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbi Afrika


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 15:37, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Barbi Afrika

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another Tiktok “Star” & Internet personality who also is a singer but falls short of both WP:MUSICBIO & WP:ENT. Subject also lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Perhaps a case of WP:TOOSOON. Celestina007 (talk) 19:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 19:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Has released singles and was nominated in the highest award show in Balkans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.143.98.206 (talk) 23:21, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The singles do not appear notable and, IMHO, unless the award was truly major/global, a nomination wouldn't show notability either. Ifnord (talk) 20:23, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sulfurboy (talk) 20:03, 2 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable singer. No significant independent coverage, as far as I can see. Alan Islas (talk) 03:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:ENTERTAINER. Ifnord (talk) 20:23, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I considered putting this up for deletion myself given the poor state of the sources, and I’m glad someone else did. Mccapra (talk) 03:20, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , ah! great minds think alike. Celestina007 (talk) 04:12, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The only thing I could see in its favour was that the article didn’t mention some gruesome self-promoting ‘charidee’ the subject had founded, which seems to be the way most nonentities prefer to squeeze their way onto Wikipedia nowadays. Mccapra (talk) 07:12, 9 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.