Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbi Losh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 01:35, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Barbi Losh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't come close to passing GNG. Name really doesn't google. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:06, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Sourced for having won a local pageant. Did't find sources for notability as claimed model, actress and dancer ... also chearleder. Per WP:BASIC.--Ben Ben (talk) 10:35, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:46, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:46, 2 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: Winner of major state-level United States pageant, from one of the most populous U.S. states, so generally speaking they are considered notable.  Maybe harder to dig for archived sources from 1980s because major Florida papers are paywalled, but I'd be surprised if she doesn't meet standards of prior precedents.  See also Articles for deletion/Ashlee Baracy (MelanieN: "major beauty pageant winners at the state level are commonly considered notable"), Articles for deletion/Regan Hartley (DGG: "Examining the various state pages, all holders of any state championship in the pageant is apparently considered notable here."), Articles for deletion/Julianna White (October 2012) (PageantUpdater: "precedent is that Miss USA & Miss America state titleholders are notable as winners of state titles & as national representatives."), Articles for deletion/Courtney Barnas, Articles for deletion/Brittany Mason.--Milowent • hasspoken  03:47, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 06:10, 8 October 2012 (UTC)




 * Weak Keep per Milowent. I don't think, on balance, that the subject is notable just for winning a state-level pageant. But if there's precedent that such a win is sufficient notability, then I defer to consensus. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:17, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 13:13, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:49, 23 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep there's definite coverage of her prior to and actually winning the event, but the actual coverage itself is pretty weak. I'm not really enthusiastic about keeping the article, but I suppose given consensus about state-level pageant winners, I will support keeping.  I, Jethrobot  drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 01:57, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Under the current standards for major state level pageants, Losh is notable. However I did have to remove a bit of the article that wasn't sourced by any of the articles linked. I did add one that mentions that she competed in the 1985 Miss USA pageant, though.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:35, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Scant coverage of a single event and no lasting coverage means that the subject of the article fails WP:ONEEVENT. Not every winner of a beauty contest is notable, especially when coverage of the person begins and ends with the contest itself. Notable enough for inclusion on a list of Miss Florida winners or in the article on the Miss Florida contest, but not by a long-shot for a stand-alone article. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 11:19, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.