Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbie as Rapunzel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 00:56, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Barbie as Rapunzel

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable direct to video film. Nothing to distinguish it from any number of other cheaply made product franchise films. The article isn't much more than a plot outline.  Web H amster  20:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep As lame as I'm sure this was, it was also a top-selling video for quite some time, and there's certainly no shortage of reliable sources. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. It stars Anjelica Huston, who won an Academy Award for Prizzi's Honor, and was nominated for The Grifters and Enemies: A Love Story (not to mention 5 Emmy nods, 6 Golden Globe nods and one addition win, etc, etc, etc). The DVD itself won two awards at the DVD Premiere Awards, and received 6 other nominations. -- Zanimum (talk) 20:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * It's strange how the article doesn't feature any of that and is more concerned with the plot (I use the term loosely). -- Web H amster  21:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The awards I mean, not the cast. -- Web H amster  21:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Variety mentions it winning for Animated Character Performance and Original Score. — Erik (talk • contrib) - 00:34, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Would that be the Variety link that doesn't appear anywhere in the article? The links that do appear in the article don't come under the banner of "substantive coverage". -- Web H amster  14:58, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  00:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per the following:


 * These establish the notability of this DTV film. — Erik (talk • contrib) - 00:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article is extremely bad but as it is a film, regardless of how bad the film itself is, it should be kept - It just needs improving. Sorry for deleting the delete notice btw - i couldn't find this page and thought it was up for deletion for no reason.Catalyst?! (talk) 18:47, 12 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- Hiding T 12:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.