Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbie as the Sleeping Beauty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 01:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Barbie as the Sleeping Beauty

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources that say what the status of this film is. This was previously deleted as a hoax. If it's not a hoax, it doesn't pass WP:NFF. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 19:37, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete assuming it's not a hoax, there don't appear to be any reliable sources on which to base a verifiable article. Guest9999 (talk) 20:47, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'm going to close this as db-nonsense. Look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&page=Barbie_as_The_Sleeping_Beauty. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 21:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, no sources, possibly a hoax, and why does the title have a different name from the bolded title in the lede? There needs to be a close look at all of the titles in that template at the bottom of the page, sourcing is severely lacking.   Corvus cornix  talk  21:20, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: I changed to db-vandalism. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 21:35, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The speedy was declined. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 02:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I declined it. The article's long history and an actual video I found on YouTube suggest to me that this probably isn't a hoax, but an idea that was briefly discussed (maybe only by fans) and never got off the ground. Let's get a solid AFD on the lack of references and then we can deal with any new article attempts quickly as re-creations of deleted content.--chaser - t 02:20, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of any verifiable secondary sources establishing notability. MuZemike  ( talk ) 06:27, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete The game Barbie as Sleeping Beauty exists as a CD-ROM kids game, but I don't think this does. The only thing I could find on it as a questionable YouTube video about the concept which is pretty much Disney copyvio/Barbie merger nonsense.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 08:36, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   —miniluv (talk) 21:54, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment As of my posting this, the article does not have an AFD tag.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:49, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * ... and now it does. Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 14:49, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: I prodded another article by the same user as a hoax: Barbie Thumbelina. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 15:37, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Either a hoax, or just not notable. rootology ( C )( T ) 06:28, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and set Redirect to Barbie film series. I'm willing to accept that this cultural icon has a notability, but ths individual article has no real notability outside the Barbie universe. If merged to Barbie film series and a redirect set, folks can find the informationright where it belongs. Wiki is improved.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * But it most likely will never exist. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 20:26, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sadly, it probably will. If somebody can make a buck by emptying the pocket of a doting parent, they will. Non-notable as an indivdual Barbie film might really be to a grownup, if this gets merged to Barbie film series, at least it will be where it will it might be expected to be found.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.