Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bard moqe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 16:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Bard moqe

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article in original research. It belongs in a wikipedia sandbox. The text in the article itself says that it was "invented" in Feb 2007. ɤіɡʍаɦɤʘʟʟ 16:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because the articles have pretty much the same content:

Delete both - per nom. WP:NFT seems to apply. - Aagtbdfoua 01:16, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, it doesn't seem to be notable. The "invented in February 2007" would indicate that it hasn't yet had time to become notable. The article is a mess and is unsourced. Until there are third-party sources, I would say probably Delete the article. Herostratus 17:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Original research for the most part, but unsourced and non-notable at the same time. Leebo T / C  17:35, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unreferenced, probably not notable yet. I have also tagged the article for context, lack of citations and general cleanup just in case it survives the AfD due to the addition of new information before the close of the discussion.   ◄    Zahakiel    ►   20:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article claims it make Tamil easy but as a Tamil i dont see hoow this is working. I did not come accross this Bard moqe or its crater other than this article.--Terrance 04:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.