Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bardon Park (Western Australia)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Let's try to sort this out using regular editing, which may include merging, and if not, we can revisit the possibility of deletion at a later time. – filelakeshoe (t / c) &#xF0F6;  08:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Bardon Park (Western Australia)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable park. Sure there's information on it but no actual proof of notability. Existence does not prove notability etc. —   IVORK  Discuss 13:08, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I searched but could find no references suggesting that this is a recognized tourist attraction or otherwise  more than an attractive but run of the mill city park in the Maylands neighborhood of Perth's Bayswater suburb.  It's not even mentioned in our articles about Maylands and Bayswater, although some other parks are. As such, notability is not established under the guideline at WP:NGEO or otherwise. (Note: there's a more notable Bardon Park in Leicestershire.) --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:05, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Community group https://www.facebook.com/bardonpark/ User:stevenebsary —Preceding undated comment added 06:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC) As the Bardon Park area is significant to Noongar Culture and history with the natural springs in the wetlands also its links to Derbarl Yerrigan (Swan River) http://www.bom.gov.au/iwk/calendars/nyoongar.shtml#djilba
 * Section substituted in from User_talk:Stevenebsary —   IVORK  Discuss 07:50, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Indigenous art installation https://facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=692968497568450&id=677400495791917

Tourist attraction park playground https://www.weekendnotes.com/bardon-park/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenebsary (talk • contribs) 08:11, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Very reluctantly.  There just does not seem to be anywhere near enough to establish notability at this time.  It is mentioned in WA Parliamentary debate though.  As much as I do not like to see the first article by a WP:NEWBIE get deleted, especially given that there seems to be so much good faith here, and having had such trouble myself when I first started, there just does not seem to be enough here for anything remotely core or in-depth or specific to the park.  If the indigenous aspect can be built up, I might be convinced to change my mind.  Aoziwe (talk) 12:20, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

How is the sv site version related here? This all started due to facebooks import from that source, causing incorrect data there for the place (well in the wrong language). Unfortunately facebook is terrible at places in many ways. Will that version still exist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenebsary (talk • contribs) 13:21, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined not to encroach into foreign language Wikipedias. From what I can tell with the assistance of a translator extension, that article was created by an automated bot. Being that was the case, and no such thing for article creation exists on the English Wikipedia, what I know of their guidelines clearly isn't enough for me to propose deletion. Most foreign language Wikipedias act independently of one another, as even the guidelines after all are all just one big agreed-upon consensus between editors. I am not familiar with the history of that article or the bot that seemingly created it. —  IVORK  Discuss 14:04, 29 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Note. The Swedish Wikipedia article mentioned above is at sv:Bardon Park (park i Australien, Western Australia). The same bot that created that article also created one for sv:Bardon Park (park i Australien, New South Wales).  That's a real neighborhood park in Coogee, New South Wales, but I don't see anything in either of these Swedish articles that suggests that either of these parks is notable under English Wikipedia standards.  --Arxiloxos (talk) 15:02, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge into Maylands, Western Australia. There's really no need to delete all of this newbie's work.--Pontificalibus (talk) 09:43, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep for now, to revisit in six months or one year. Or at worst merge, possibly into Maylands, Western Australia.  Or move to List of parks in Western Australia and develop. Quite small municipal/urban parks in the United States are "Kept" at AFD fairly frequently.  Coverage of parks in Western Australia could be developed by creating a list-article, with a table row for each one.  I note there is not a List of parks in Australia (currently a redlink) or even an international List of parks (currently a redlink), though there is a List of national parks and List of national parks in Australia. -- do  ncr  am  17:08, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note there are sources about community involvement in the park, from relatively local news sources and blogs, but I think these add up and suffice. For example:
 * blog review/description of the park
 * I added that "Nearby residents concerned about the park incorporated the Bardon Park Riverside Restoration Group to address weeds in 2016. The park has been managed by the City of Bayswater since 2006." based on |title=Residents to tackle Bardon Park weeds themselves, of 11 October 2016
 * I added that: "A nature playground was developed for $175,000 and opened in March 2016. The playground features a rock garden which illustrates 'the six Noongar seasons of Birak - the first summer, Bunuru - the second summer, Djeran - autumn, Makuru - the first rains, Djilba - the second rains and Kambarang - flowering.'", based on the City of Bayswater's facebook posting about it:.
 * I think this stuff adds up. What is needed is some helpful development, not eradication of good faith new contributor's work. -- do  ncr  am  17:26, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: delete or merge?

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  12:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. we have normally kept all substantial city parks as geographic features, and the references are good enough for that.  DGG ( talk ) 00:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 01:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist.
 * Keep, meets WP:GNG, re sources discussed throughout this afd, a "Parks" section in the Maylands, Western Australia article would also be useful. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:12, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 22:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, I'm not sure that this is a "substantial city park", to quote DDG. If this were Central Park or Hyde Park then definitely, but I'm not convinced this is anything more than an ordinary suburban park, and none of the sources shown or arguments presented have convinced me otherwise.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 22:17, 22 September 2017 (UTC).
 * Weak keep - This seems to have been covered in multiple reliable sources. Although there aren't too many, I think that there are enough to verify the contents of the article. RileyBugz 会話 投稿記録  20:06, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete just a small city park with no indication of notability. I was easily convinced by reading this from one of the sources in the article: "would have to be one of the prettiest, albeit least-known of our riverside parklands. Relatively small in size, ..." It has some grass, a playground, some picnic tables (as do thousands of others).  Just a WP:MILL park. MB 02:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep not sure this strictly meets GNG, but normally with geographical features we just need their existence to be proven, which in this article it has. jcc (tea and biscuits) 11:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.