Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barker (advertising agency)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  23:28, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Barker (advertising agency)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The sources fall short of WP:ORG; they are largely press releases or passing mentions at best. ~TPW 16:52, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ~TPW 16:52, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Advertising, Companies,  and New York.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails notability as there is a lack of reputable coverage that directly addresses the company and its notability. GraziePrego (talk) 03:21, 3 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.