Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barloc of Norbury


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Barloc of Norbury

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject does not meet notability guidelines, especially WP:BIO. A google books search only shows a passing mention in several works, and no other notable mentions. Thanks! - KJ  click here  04:27, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. I believe an entry in an Oxford University reference work is, for historical figures, sufficient to establish notability for Wikipedia purposes. The information provided is certainly enough to establish there is a plausible search term involved (even if the article title may not be the best). An encyclopedia, after all, strives to be encyclopedic. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 04:51, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Historical figure; meets guidelines. - Altenmann >t 05:22, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:11, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Saints are always considered to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 19:25, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep -- This will always be a short article, because (apparently) litlte is known, but that is no reason for deletion. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.