Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barlow Knoll


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Gettysburg Battlefield. Redirect was made for unrelated reasons some time after this AfD was created.

The AfD is being closed many years later, because it was never properly closed back then, because it was never visible, because it was never transcluded on any of the daily logpages. Technically, it has still been open this whole time.

Nobody else could ever be admitted here, because this door was made only for you. I am now going to shut it. (non-admin closure) jp×g 07:00, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Barlow Knoll

 * – (View AfD

I am nominating that these articles be merged with the Gettysburg Battlefield article, since they describe minor portions of the battlefield and from what I've read these places were not vital for either army to possess in order to win the battle. Wild Wolf (talk) 22:47, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Just a question. You mentioned "probably need to be left as a stub", so does that mean the article should be retained and not deleted?  Lake Woodhouse in Denver (talk) 19:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)  Comment struck as sockpuppet of User:Target for Today, who is currently indefinitely blocked. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:42, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep -- I pasted this nomination from Talk:Gettysburg Battlefield to see if I could do it right, but I agree with the Vegaswikan that the article should not be deleted. The topic of Barlow Knoll is a historically notable landform like The Peach Orchard, McPherson Ridge, East Cemetery Hill, etc. and clearly meets the wikipedia notability requirements for includable topics.  Isn't that all that's need to keep?  Also in addition to the Civil War battle at the knoll and the postbellum historic events, the hill is more notable than the adjacent Blocher's Run, which itself meets the notability requirements for a stand-alone article.  Hopefully some other folks have ideas on the matter (there were a lot at Articles for deletion/The Peach Orchard which is a similar hornfel and had a somewhat less desperate battle.)  Lake Woodhouse in Denver (talk) 19:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)  Comment struck as sockpuppet of User:Target for Today, who is currently indefinitely blocked. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:42, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.