Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barnegat Fund Management (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:06, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Barnegat Fund Management
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails to assert corporate notability. It was a spam article but was fixed a while ago leaving virtually no content and no independent, reliable sources. A quick Google search reveals no major reviews.  Dr Strauss   talk   10:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep This source from 2010 is explicitly about the fund. This is a press release, but the claims that "Barnegat Fund was named to Barron's Top 100 Hedge Funds for the sixth year in a row and is the only fund to receive that honor for the last six consecutive years." and "Currently, Bloomberg ranks the Barnegat Fund as the #1 Fixed-Income Relative-Value hedge fund in the world for the period from 2001 to the present date." are credible claims of notability. There are sources available if one looks for "Barnegat Fund", not just "Barnegat Fund Management" and they can and should be added to the article. Alansohn (talk) 14:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment This reference from the nypost in 2010 fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. The press release fails WP:ORGIND. There are no references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. -- HighKing ++ 15:53, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 18:04, 12 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:52, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. References fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. Wikipedia is not a marketing or advocacy platform. -- HighKing ++ 15:53, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- sources do not meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Article is TNT-eligible, with an easter egg link from nn Bob Treue to Bob Treue . K.e.coffman (talk) 05:39, 24 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.