Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barnes & Noble Classics Collection


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Barnes & Noble. (non-admin closure) czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:55, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Barnes & Noble Classics Collection

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article strikes me as a complete violation of WP:NOTDIR: this is a directory. I see no point to this at all--whatever text there is can't even verifiably establish that the series as a whole has any kind of notability by our standards. Drmies (talk) 04:05, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Barnes_%26_Noble. Other than a very brief mention in the main article's publishing section, there's no need for an article detailing each and every book that B&N releases in the Classics Collection. There's no real coverage of this publishing line. Sometimes there are brief mentions, but nothing so-indepth that it would mark it as exceptional. Might be a valid enough redirect, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:44, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  06:55, 2 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect per above, does not meet N on its own. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:14, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.