Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barof (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:29, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Barof
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Barof

This film article does not have enough information to establish film notability. There has already been a previous AFD, so that the question should be whether this article contains any additional information. However, it has neither a plot summary nor reception information, so that the article does not provide any third-party information. (I have not read the deleted article and so am not tagging this article for G4.) A check of the references shows not only that there is no independent secondary coverage, but that there are only three references, each of which is repeated, and they basically say that the movie exists.

If a plot summary and reception information can be found within seven days, a Heymann close may be possible. Otherwise this article should be draftified or deleted. (Do not salt it, because someone might find reviews.) Robert McClenon (talk) 04:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  17:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - The original version of this article had a plot summary that may have been copyvio. This does not affect this nomination.  Reception information is still lacking.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Does not meet NFILM with the cited refs. Cannot find any reliable reviews in English, however, Bengali or offline sources may exist -- Ab207 (talk) 07:20, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment Does the Kolkata Mail plot summary count? or this from a Canadian website . The Canadian website serves a large Indian population in the Greater Toronto Area. Oaktree b (talk) 23:51, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * "Plot summaries without critical commentary" do not establish notability per WP:NFSOURCES. No idea about the Canadian website's reliability but one review is not sufficient to meet NFILM. -- Ab207 (talk) 08:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I concur with Robert McClenon's analysis of the cited sources. The only one of any depth is The Times of India, which is non-indepenent pre-release promotion. The external links are more of the same. The two links suggested by Oaktree b are advertorials ("Eros Now, South Asia's leading streaming entertainment service owned by the Eros STX Global Corporation (NYSE: EROS), a Global Entertainment company, recently unveiled the trailer ...", "creates a void in the life of his mother as well as his wife"). Searches of the usual types in English and Bengali found nothing better, no independent full-length reviews by nationally known critics, such as needed to meet WP:NFF criterion 1. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:32, 11 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.