Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baron von Luxxury


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:28, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Baron von Luxxury

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No reliable sources found outside a trivial mention in Billboard. Tagged for notability since 11/09. Simply having remix credits for notable artists doesn't transfer notability, nor does having a single song appear on an episode of CSI: Miami. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:30, 17 September 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:31, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment, I found and added a reference, but I don't think it's enough on it's own. I'll tag it for rescue to see if anyone on the rescue squad can do better. --Nuujinn (talk) 23:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unreferenced BLP, fails WP:GNG.  Snotty Wong   spout 04:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, please check the article again, I tracked down the Billboard article. It's a crappy article still, but AFD is not cleanup and the Billboard article together with the article at SFGate are I think to clear the bar for general notability. Both articles are significant in coverage and from reliable sources. --Nuujinn (talk) 09:55, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep His work is notable, and he gets coverage as well. Google news says this bit is from the San Francisco Chronicle    D r e a m Focus  22:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep – Significant coverage in Billboard and San Francisco Chronicle; meets WP:MUSICBIO criterion #1. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 00:31, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.