Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barons di San Marciano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was: Delete. Voice of All  @ ''' 03:59, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

Barons di San Marciano
Not a real encyclopedia entry; it doesn't give any useful or encyclopedic information. It has been previously submitted for deletion but no consenses was reached. The author complained that he hadn't had enough time to update it, but now it's been almost a year. Jeff 17:44, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Jeff. Eddie.willers 17:51, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Jeff. --MacRusgail 17:53, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --pgk( talk ) 18:38, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Note This page was up for deletion once upon a time? Cannot go for deletion again!!!Charles. 0528, 18th October 2005 (EST)
 * Yes it can. It's considered bad form to put a page which passes AfD back up without waiting a reasonable time, but Guide to deletion is quite clear in saying that "(i)f you think that an article was wrongly kept after the AFD, you could wait to see if the article is improved to overcome your objections; if it isn't, you can renominate it for deletion." Denni &#9775; 03:25, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Time for it to go, eventually somebody may re-create it. And yes, it can go on AfD one more time. -- Rune Welsh | &tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa; | Esperanza  20:57, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * If this is the best that a year can bring, I see no need to rush to a keep. Delete. Denni &#9775; 03:20, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or Modify immediately. Unless the content of the article is increased I would agree with you that this article provides no encyclopeadic info. Maltesedog 13:31, 21 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.