Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barony of Fulwood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:14, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Barony of Fulwood

 * — (View AfD)


 * Delete. Non-noteable stuff and nonsense. - Kittybrewster 20:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. It seems in this nomination some parts are missing, see AFD Phoe  talk 21:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Taken care in the meantime Phoe  talk 08:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - note that both were listed previously in 2005 - [[Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Baron_of_Fulwood]] RHB 23:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete lacks multiple independent sources. Edison 16:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for the same reasons I gave on Articles_for_deletion/Baron_of_Dirleton Alci12 11:59, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Likewise. Proteus (Talk) 11:17, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: feudal baronies have now been completely abolished by Act of Parliament (2004). They still had some serious meaning prior to 1747. It was always the case until very recently that the feudal baron would own a reasonable acreage of the original barony which included the ancient caput. With the recent adoption of the English "paper" baronies and Lordships the entire thing has become a fraud. David Lauder 15:50, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.