Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barostat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn per sources. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:45, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Barostat

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Finding lots of uses of the term, but nothing explaining what it is. Hands down WP:DICDEF, no attempt to do anything with the article since 2009. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:46, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 07:13, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

  References 
 * Keep. Regular topic, that can be expanded. A book search revealed multiple sources that explain what it is, a few have been added. Meets WP:GNG. Sam Sailor Talk! 07:56, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep I am seeing a number of decent references. Sure this article could be expanded. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 08:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep This should be snow closed as it seems clear that the nomination is clueless and the topic is a perfectly respectable medical instrument. Andrew D. (talk) 16:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.