Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barpathar High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  06:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Barpathar High School

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I don’t see any sources in English to suggest that this school is notable. There may be sources in Assamese or other languages. Mccapra (talk) 06:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Assam. Mccapra (talk) 06:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:16, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect. In the absence of sources conferring notability I would normally support a redirect to the locality the school serves — presumably in this case the Nilabari area of Bongaigaon — but there's no article. Could feasibly add its name to the list of schools in Bongaigaon and redirect there, otherwise delete. Rupples (talk) 10:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - Notability of schools, particularly in areas where sources may not be in English, can be a vexing issue. Sources don't have to be in English to demonstrate notability, and they don't even have to be online. But at this stage there is not a single source in this article, which doesn't even properly describe where this school is. Searches do find some primary sources, showing it exists, but we don't have an article and we don't have sifficient material to write an article. The state of this one, 10 years on from its creation, is so poor that WP:TNT applies. If someone wants to write about this school in the future, having found some secondary sources showing notability, they won't need to begin from here. As it stands, no evidence that it passes GNG. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 12:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.