Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barratt Family


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 22:23, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Barratt Family

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Started by a vandal, possible COI (relative?), non-notable. VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 02:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

I came across this article when dealing with user:Hennyxlb, who has since been blocked indefinitely. I believe there may be a COI as evidenced here. In any case, this is a clear case of non-notability. I'm not sure even if Betty Barratt is notable.VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 02:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Unlike Betty Barratt, I see nothing here even hinting at a claim of notability apart from that which pertains to Betty herself.  Has no business standing as an indepedent article.  Un  sch  ool  03:42, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 04:35, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being related to a notable person is not grounds for notabilty. 'Nuff said. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 07:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete - the family doesn't have any notability in itself. Notability is not inherited. The notability of the main family member is even in discussion. McMarcoP (talk) 08:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Even if Betty Barratt herself is notable, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Maybe early close as WP:SNOWBALL ? Qwfp (talk) 10:08, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. The article purports to be about a family, yet only one family member other than Betty Barratt is mentioned, and the coverage of him is less than one sentence long. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 13:18, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: A non-notable family. Joe Chill (talk) 18:49, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.