Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barren sign


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Barren sign

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There is no need for a page on this astrology wah-wah (and even less for what is basically a WP:NOTDICTIONARY definition of astrology wah-wah). The only sources are from, naturally, astrology proponents (or historical ones, at that); and this is not the kind of detail that would go in a mainstream encyclopedia. Fails WP:NOT and WP:GNG (due to the sources for this not being independent). I've considered a merge, but there's nothing here that is worthy of being merged, even to Astrological sign (where the simple summary that "According to astrology, celestial phenomena relate to human activity" is plenty enough). Hence, delete RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 21:58, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astrology-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, because Mercury is retrograde. Skyerise (talk) 02:30, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, there's no there there. PianoDan (talk) 18:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete It might be possible to have an encyclopedic treatment of the various attributes that different astrologers have assigned to different signs over the centuries, but this is not the way to do it. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 21:35, 24 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.