Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barricade gel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Rewritten as Fire-retardant gel and advertising stripped out. There may be a better name for this article, or indeed an article may already exist that I've missed - please feel free to move it there if so. Note: I speedied the FireAde article as blatant spam, which it plainly was. Black Kite 22:56, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Barricade gel

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The page looks like an advertisement. No other Wikipedia page links to it, but it can be found using google if you know the product name ("barricade gel"). The article lacks sources and I think it is non-notable. It was written mostly by one author with minor modifications by others. KarlFrei (talk) 14:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. Note also that it links to articles on similar, competing products like FireAde; that page is even worse than this one.  Question: is there a general article about this class of firefighting gel material? - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Replace with general article on class of products. As noted above there seem to be other articles on competing products, so this isn't exactly unique. I do agree that the type of product is deserving of an entry, or at least a mention in an appropriate article on firefighting/fire prevention methods. --BrucePodger (talk) 19:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.