Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrier Islands Gazette


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Nja 247 08:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Barrier Islands Gazette

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable local paper. Gordonrox24 ''' &#124; Talk 14:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 18:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, very small town, very localized paper that appears to have won no awards, and received no notice from any one beyond local websites. Fails WP:N. -- AnmaFinotera  (talk · contribs) 00:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, promotional article about a local newspaper with small circulation. Could not find any secondary sources. -- &oelig; &trade; 01:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable local newspaper. Niteshift36 (talk) 09:13, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Newspapers and magazines are rarely covered by other newspapers and magazines. This is a reliable source for the region it covers. It makes the encyclopedia more complete and it should be included. If a stand-alone article isn't warranted then it should be merged somewhere and listed with other Florida periodicals. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:09, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It can also be merged to the area it covers: Treasure Island, Florida or a barrier islands article if one exists as it seems to cover other areas as well. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Self-promotional entry for free newspaper. Audit Bureau of Circulations has no record of publication. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Editorseditor (talk • contribs) 16:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.